Search for: "United States of America v. Hedges et al"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
[iii] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Harvey et al.Amicus brief of Gerald Sherwin et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Evanson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al., Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See, e.g., America's Constitution: A Biography 170-73, 556-57 (2006); Akhil Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution 17-19, 404 (2012); see also Akhil Amar, The Words That Made Us 472-465 (2021). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:42 am
Rushaid, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
By the early 1990s, we were down to just 20 AAAs, and at the dawn of our new millennium you could count America’s AAA-rated companies on two hands even if you’d lost a finger… only 9 remained. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Intellectual Property Colloquium - IP podcast site (Lessig Blog) IP finance, market disruption and hedging (IP finance) Reward or punishment? [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, class action funding arrangements are required to be disclosed by Standing Order of all judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
